BlogRetirement Planning

Sequence-of-Returns Risk: Why Two Retirees With the Same Money Get Completely Different Results

Same portfolio balance. Same investments. Same average return. One retiree runs out of money at 78. The other finishes with millions. Here is what makes the difference and how to protect against it.

King Legacy Group

King Legacy Group

Sequence-of-Returns Risk: Why Two Retirees With the Same Money Get Completely Different Results

Two people retired on the same day.

Same portfolio balance. Same investments. Same average return over twenty years.

One ran out of money at age 78. The other died with more than two million dollars.

Same money. Same return. Completely different outcomes.

That difference has a name. It is called sequence-of-returns risk.

What Sequence-of-Returns Risk Actually Is

Your financial plan likely shows a projected rate of return. Maybe seven percent. Maybe eight. That number is used to calculate when you can retire, how much you will have, and how long it will last.

The problem is that those projections assume returns arrive in a smooth, consistent order. They do not.

The order of those returns, not the average, is what actually determines whether your retirement works or fails.

Sequence-of-returns risk is the danger that poor investment returns in the early years of retirement can permanently damage your portfolio, even if the long-run average looks fine.

Why Average Returns Are a Lie

When you are saving for retirement, a bad year hurts but you recover. You keep contributing. You buy shares at lower prices. Your portfolio has time to rebound.

When you are retired and withdrawing, a bad year is fundamentally different. You are selling shares at low prices to cover your monthly expenses. Those shares are gone. They cannot recover for you.

Consider two scenarios, each starting with one million dollars and fifty thousand dollars in annual withdrawals:

Scenario one: Year one up ten percent, year two down ten percent. End result after withdrawals: approximately eight hundred and fifty thousand dollars.

Scenario two: Year one down ten percent, year two up ten percent. Same fifty thousand dollar withdrawal each year. End result: approximately seven hundred and ninety-five thousand dollars.

Same average return of zero. More than fifty-five thousand dollar difference in just two years. Multiply that across thirty years of retirement, and the math becomes devastating.

The Retirement Red Zone

The decade surrounding retirement, roughly ages sixty to seventy, is where sequence-of-returns risk is highest. This window is called the retirement red zone.

The S&P 500 is down approximately four percent year to date in 2026, following an eighteen percent return in 2025. That volatility is completely normal across an investing lifetime.

In the retirement red zone, normal volatility becomes your biggest financial enemy.

Research suggests that a retiree who experiences a thirty percent portfolio drop in year one of retirement may need to reduce withdrawals by thirty to forty percent permanently, or risk running out of money a full decade ahead of schedule.

Researchers modeled the safe withdrawal rate for new retirees in 2026 at three point nine percent. Most people have been told to plan at four percent. That seemingly small difference, compounded across a thirty-year retirement, is significant.

The Safe Floor Strategy

The answer to sequence-of-returns risk is not market timing. It is not moving everything to cash. It is not a different asset allocation.

The answer is a guaranteed income floor that covers non-negotiable expenses from a source that does not depend on market performance.

When essential monthly expenses are covered by guaranteed income, you are no longer a forced seller in a down market. Your investment portfolio can stay invested through volatility instead of being liquidated at exactly the wrong moment.

A Fixed Index Annuity, or FIA, connects growth to a market index while guaranteeing no principal loss. In strong market years, you participate in the upside. In down market years, the floor holds at zero. You do not credit losses.

Combined with a lifetime income rider, a Fixed Index Annuity converts to a guaranteed monthly income stream you cannot outlive. That guaranteed floor is what separates retirees who survive bad sequence years from those who do not.

The Three-Step Red Zone Protection Plan

This is not a complex strategy. It requires three decisions made in the right order:

Step one: Identify your non-negotiable monthly expenses. Housing. Healthcare. Food. Utilities. The bills that cannot wait for the market to recover.

Step two: Build a guaranteed income source that covers those non-negotiable expenses three to five years before you actually need the income. The funding window matters. A Fixed Index Annuity needs time to accumulate before converting to income.

Step three: Leave your investment portfolio completely untouched for the first three to five years of retirement. This is the window where sequence-of-returns risk is highest. If guaranteed income covers your floor, your portfolio does not need to generate income during that window. It can recover from volatility without being forced to sell.

King Legacy Group designs this structure for clients who are in or approaching the retirement red zone. The goal is a retirement income plan that holds its ground regardless of what the market does in year one.

Frequently Asked Questions

How is a Fixed Index Annuity different from a variable annuity?

A variable annuity is directly invested in market subaccounts. Its value goes up and down with the market. A Fixed Index Annuity is not. Growth is credited based on a market index, but the principal is guaranteed. The floor is zero. You do not lose what you put in. That principal protection is what makes it appropriate as an income floor strategy.

Does a Fixed Index Annuity mean I give up all market upside?

No. A Fixed Index Annuity participates in index gains up to a cap or participation rate set by the carrier. In strong market years, the account credits growth. The trade-off is that you give up returns above the cap in exchange for the floor. For an income floor strategy, that trade-off is intentional. Growth above the cap belongs in your investment portfolio.

When should I start building the guaranteed income floor?

Three to five years before you need the income is the standard guidance. Earlier is better. If you are in your mid-fifties, the conversation should start now. If you are in your early sixties and approaching the red zone, the urgency is higher. King Legacy Group recommends a strategy review at least five years before your target retirement date.

What if I am already retired and did not do this in advance?

It depends on your current portfolio balance, your non-negotiable expenses, and how many years into retirement you are. A portion of an existing portfolio can be repositioned into a guaranteed income strategy even after retirement begins. This does not reverse past sequence damage, but it can protect against future sequence risk for the remaining years.

Schedule your strategy review here. Complimentary. No pressure. A clear path to your LivingLEGACY™.

Related Articles

Your 401(k) Has a Tax Problem Nobody Warned You About

Sequence of Returns Risk: The Retirement Threat That Can Wreck Your Plan Before It Begins

Fixed Annuity Rates Are at a Ten-Year High -- And the Window Will Not Stay Open

King Legacy Group

About the Author

King Legacy Group

King Legacy Group helps business owners, professionals, and families build integrated strategies for growth, protection, liquidity, and legacy.

Design your LivingLEGACY™

A strategy review is where clarity becomes a plan. Complimentary. No pressure.

Complimentary. No pressure. A clear path to your LivingLEGACY™.

Planning Insights

Receive new planning insights, guides, and educational updates.